$7 million dollar savings per 10,000 insureds over 5 years is very low savings with HSA coverage. That’s only $140 a year savings per insured. The average cost for employer based health insurance is $400 a year for single coverage. HSA insurance for a 30-year-old male is only $60 a month in most states. The average savings should be more like $2,000 a year per employee, [plus] the tax savings because their is no payroll tax on employer HSA deposits. $2,000 X 10,000 employees = $20,000,000 per year or $100,000,000 over 5 years.
But that’s the difference between dangerous non-portable employer-based health insurance and the security of low cost portable HSA “individual insurance.” Aetna sure did a good job with their so-called statistics to make HSAs look less attractive than they really are.
That’s enough Aetna bashing. Aetna has been one of the most innovative companies in pushing the limits of consumer driven health care. We owe them a debt of gratitude.
Ron, you misunderstood the bullet. The $7 million savings applied to employers who offered HSAs as an option. So, some large portion of the group was not in HSAs, very likely 75% or so. Yet the WHOLE group still saved money. The savings of the HSA enrollees is spread over the whole group.
March 20th, 2009 at 10:11 am
$7 million dollar savings per 10,000 insureds over 5 years is very low savings with HSA coverage. That’s only $140 a year savings per insured. The average cost for employer based health insurance is $400 a year for single coverage. HSA insurance for a 30-year-old male is only $60 a month in most states. The average savings should be more like $2,000 a year per employee, [plus] the tax savings because their is no payroll tax on employer HSA deposits. $2,000 X 10,000 employees = $20,000,000 per year or $100,000,000 over 5 years.
But that’s the difference between dangerous non-portable employer-based health insurance and the security of low cost portable HSA “individual insurance.” Aetna sure did a good job with their so-called statistics to make HSAs look less attractive than they really are.
March 20th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
Very interesting observation, Ron. I don’t think Aetna is even in the individual market.
March 21st, 2009 at 1:24 am
That’s enough Aetna bashing. Aetna has been one of the most innovative companies in pushing the limits of consumer driven health care. We owe them a debt of gratitude.
March 21st, 2009 at 4:37 am
Ron, you misunderstood the bullet. The $7 million savings applied to employers who offered HSAs as an option. So, some large portion of the group was not in HSAs, very likely 75% or so. Yet the WHOLE group still saved money. The savings of the HSA enrollees is spread over the whole group.
March 24th, 2009 at 6:32 am
I think Aetna was also helpful in persuading the Treasury to make rulings favorable to HSA expansion.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:08 pm
Aetna Ceo Ron Williams has been very good on promoting CDHC in Congressional testimony and in public speeches.