- Beam Me Up
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- Plans
- Ron Bachman
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
- Florida Medicaid Reform; One Year’s Progress
- Medicaid Data: Is It Any of Your Business?
- Obama Health Plan Evolves Some More
- All That’s New in the World of Fat
- New Drugs Save Lives, Reduce Costs
- Obama Health Plan Becoming a Moving Target
- Health Tip: Drink Beer
- Cowen on Medicare
- Cowen on HSAs
- HSA Webinar
Archive for the 'Medical Economics' Category
Kudos to Victor Fuchs for a JAMA article (which unfortunately is gated) and to Fuchs and Ezekiel Emanuel in a Chicago Tribune editorial that says much the same thing. Economic statistics show what common sense should have told us anyway: health insurance and other employee benefits come at the expense of money wages. Far from be being a gift from employers, health insurance is "paid for" by employees and health cost increases are the primary reason for stagnating wage growth.
A new study from the Southern Economic Journal found that small business firms will avoid hiring someone with high-expected health costs if doing so means they will pay more for insurance. Also they are more successful at this than large firms. State health care reforms meant to prohibit such activity have little effect.
