- Beam Me Up
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- Plans
- Ron Bachman
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
- Florida Medicaid Reform; One Year’s Progress
- Medicaid Data: Is It Any of Your Business?
- Obama Health Plan Evolves Some More
- All That’s New in the World of Fat
- New Drugs Save Lives, Reduce Costs
- Obama Health Plan Becoming a Moving Target
- Health Tip: Drink Beer
- Cowen on Medicare
- Cowen on HSAs
- HSA Webinar
Archive for the 'Babies' Category
A Kaiser Foundation study claims to show how awful Health Saving Account plans are for women who experience pregnancy and child birth. It focuses only on the extra out-of-pocket costs HSA plan members face, while completely ignoring the premium savings from choosing such plans. (If you have an endowed foundation and don't have to compete for funds, I suppose you can get away with this stuff.)
According to Kaiser, an uncomplicated pregnancy by vaginal delivery costs $9,660 in Maryland. A C-section costs $12,453. If a lot of things go wrong, the cost is $287,453. The researchers calculate the out-of-pocket costs in those cases for different types of health insurance plans.
Surely the interesting question is not, "What is the patient's share of the bill?" but rather, "Why is the bill so high in the first place?"
