- Beam Me Up
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- Plans
- Ron Bachman
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
- Florida Medicaid Reform; One Year’s Progress
- Medicaid Data: Is It Any of Your Business?
- Obama Health Plan Evolves Some More
- All That’s New in the World of Fat
- New Drugs Save Lives, Reduce Costs
- Obama Health Plan Becoming a Moving Target
- Health Tip: Drink Beer
- Cowen on Medicare
- Cowen on HSAs
- HSA Webinar
Archive for the 'Medical Tourism' Category
Many, many years ago, the Nobel Prize-winning economist Kenneth Arrow wrote an article about asymmetry of information in medical care (your doctor knows more than you do). Since then, countless textbook authors, op-ed writers and policywonk briefers have seized on Arrow's observation to argue that a free market will not work in health care. Ergo, we need a regulated, institutionalized, bureaucratized market - like what we have in the US and almost everywhere else.
The problem with this line of reasoning is that it commits what logicians call the fallacy of the excluded middle. The unstated, and therefore unexamined, minor premise is: regulated markets can solve the problem, or at least do better than free markets. As it turns out, this minor premise is difficult, if not impossible, to defend.
