RSS Feed This entry was posted on Friday, February 29th, 2008 at 4:06 pm and is filed under FYI, Medical Economics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
- Beam Me Up
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- In Memoriam
- Personal Testimony
- Plans
- Updates
Categories
Contributors
- Ron Bachman
- Michael Bond
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- Devon Herrick
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
Recent Posts
- Employers as Doctors
- Medicare’s Double Standard
- Nursing Home Scandal
- Good News: Health Care Inflation Down; Employers Offering Insurance Up (But You Won’t Hear It Anywhere Else)
- Obesity Update
- Parkland Emergency Room Follow-up
- Wall Street Journal Responds to Obama
- News Flash: Universal Coverage Isn’t Free
- So How Is Obama Going to Pay for It?
- Repairing a Tainted Image
Home Pages
 |
Feb 29, 2008
A new study from the Southern Economic Journal found that small business firms will avoid hiring someone with high-expected health costs if doing so means they will pay more for insurance. Also they are more successful at this than large firms. State health care reforms meant to prohibit such activity have little effect.
Leave a Reply