This entry was posted on Monday, March 10th, 2008 at 10:25 am and is filed under Beam Me Up, Health Care Costs. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
- Beam Me Up
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- In Memoriam
- Personal Testimony
- Plans
- Updates
Categories
Contributors
- Ron Bachman
- Michael Bond
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- Devon Herrick
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
Recent Posts
- Employers as Doctors
- Medicare’s Double Standard
- Nursing Home Scandal
- Good News: Health Care Inflation Down; Employers Offering Insurance Up (But You Won’t Hear It Anywhere Else)
- Obesity Update
- Parkland Emergency Room Follow-up
- Wall Street Journal Responds to Obama
- News Flash: Universal Coverage Isn’t Free
- So How Is Obama Going to Pay for It?
- Repairing a Tainted Image
Home Pages
Mar 10, 2008
A new Dutch study finds that even though obese people die earlier than their thinner, fitter cohorts, their lifetime health costs are lower ($371k vs. $417k). The healthy folks eventually die of something - cancer, Alzheimer's, etc. - and run up higher lifetime medical bills.
News of this study caused me to miss not a single step in my otherwise untroubled life. But all those nosy Parker paternalists who want to pry into every aspect of our lives and order everybody around must be unnerved. Fat taxes are out. Fat subsidies are in.
[Psst. Don't tell a soul. Researchers got the same results for smoking (only $326k).]
3 Responses to “Fat is Good”

March 10th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
To state the obvious, the purpose of health care is not (simply) to save money on health care. If it were, a one-drug formulary (cyanide) would be the most cost-effective.
March 13th, 2008 at 9:59 pm
I am always amazed at those who evangelize that spending money on “preventive” health care will help patients and save money.
The data on that claim is sketchy and is pure propaganda designed to subvert the use of health care funds for actual medical care!
My wife and I were theorizing that in our brave new health care world envisioned by those who know “better than everyone else” we will be told what to eat and not to eat. We will be monitored and food ration cards handed out to ensure that red meat is consumed only on a very special holiday…IF we have been very good citizens.
Thanks for exposing this nonsense for what it is. Of course those who are not obese cost the health care system more over time….they live longer! DUH!
April 17th, 2008 at 9:07 am
I agree but the question is what do these people pay into the system before they die? On average there should be some profit, ideally for both groups seperately.