RSS Feed This entry was posted on Friday, April 18th, 2008 at 7:11 am and is filed under FYI, Health Care Costs. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
- Beam Me Up
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Drugs
- Health Care Access
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- Racial Disparities
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- In Memoriam
- Personal Testimony
- Plans
- Quote of the Day
- Updates
Categories
Contributors
- Ron Bachman
- Michael Bond
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- Devon Herrick
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
Recent Posts
- A Gut Reaction
- FDA Approves Non-Drug Treatments More Quickly than Drugs
- 1113
- Good News on the HSA Front
- The Technology Solution
- Obama Advisor Advocates HSAs
- Getting It All Wrong on Mental Health Parity
- New Drugs Pay Off
- Baucus Plan Offers More Problems Than Solutions
Blogroll
Apr 18, 2008
For more than a year, I haven't received a single dollar from any insurance company. I work for my patients. A few hundred doctors across the country are working the same way, some in blue-collar towns. Routine care should be affordable to the middle class, and as more doctors and more patients form relationships that exclude insurance companies, prices will drop. Insurance doesn't make routine care affordable; it makes it more expensive by adding a middleman. I know that some patients can afford nothing, so two afternoons a month I volunteer at a clinic that cares for indigent patients, which I could not have done with the huge patient volume I was seeing a few years ago.
This is a doctor writing in the LA Times.
3 Responses to “Health Care without Health Insurance”
April 18th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
The Health Insurance Mafia
Here is a great editorial in the Wall Street Journal on how the health insurance industry acts like the Mafia:
The Los Angeles Times also featured a “doctor against health insurance” editorial on Wednesday (HT to John Goodman):
April 28th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
Dr. Fuchs’ actions seem to show that market forces work quite well in health care as it pertains to insurance, even on the supply side.
As for shackles imposed on doctors by insurance companies, that is entirely misplaced. Doctors are free to see any patients they choose to, even without insurance, as Dr. Fuchs has shown. Doctors voluntarily choose to join a network. (Agreed to charges/fees are set by Network Operators - often separate and distinct corporations unrelated to insurance companies.) Doctors are hardly forced to join a network. They can even opt out of a network, again as Dr. Fuchs has shown.
The federal government, through the creation of Medicare as as part of LBJ’s Great Society, and state governments, as part of Medicaid, stimulated out of control pricing by creating Usual & Customary fees-paying doctors AND hospitals directly through assignment of Medicare benefits. Rates were set at whatever the market would bear. Medicare had no rate limits or other governors – such as network contracts.
Prior to Medicare, doctors were paid by their patients directly without any middleman insurance company, as Dr. Fuchs likes to think of them. Prior to Medicare, the insurance industry offered Hospitalization Insurance. No such policy of Major Medical Insurance existed. Payments to insured patients (not to doctors or hospitals through assignment) were made in a flat dollar amount by indemnity policies with no regard as to what the hospital charged.
It’s nice to see that Dr. Fuchs regards his business model as progress. To me, it merely appears to be the same physician practice model used back in the 1950s and 1960s. Remember Marcus Welby, M.D.?
I think it also shows that government involvement is not the answer and that market forces ultimately win out - even in spite of government involvement.
May 1st, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Mr. Goodman: Thanks for the plug.
Mr. Dowling: Market forces do ultimately win out, but the tax incentive of employer-funded health insurance creates a large incentive to purchase care through insurance rather than directly. This inflates prices and ultimately leads to the problems I wrote about in the op-ed.
PS: Regina Hertzlinger, who I see is a contributor to this blog, is one of the people who inspire me to remember that paying attention to market forces and giving patients choices is better for everyone.