Sign up to receive
Health Alerts via Email
Enter email address below:

To receive via RSS Feed
Click here:
RSS Feed
Free Our Health Care Now!

Contributors

  • Ron Bachman
  • Michael Bond
  • Jim Frogue
  • John Goodman
  • Linda Gorman
  • Robert Graboyes
  • John R. Graham
  • Devon Herrick
  • Regina Herzlinger
  • June O'Neill
  • Roy Ramthun
  • Greg Scandlen

Recent Posts


Blogroll


One more reason to watch Congressional debates on C-SPAN: After being confronted with the absurd, students do better on tests.

WSJ: “Fraudulence and fiscal sleight-of-hand.” They’re talking about the Baucus bill.

David Cutler: Even without reform, the cost curve may be bent: Low-cost new technologies will replace high-cost ones; I.T. will lower administration costs; and managed care will lower the cost of chronic care.

Bookmark and Share
4 Responses to “Hits & Misses – 2009/10/14”
  1. Stephen C. Says:

    RE: the C-SPAN observation. Did the study find that the more absurd the the prelude, the better the test results?

  2. Larry C. Says:

    I think Cutler is wrong.

  3. Devon Herrick Says:

    I respect Cutler’s work. However, lower-cost technologies will not slow the growth of spending in an industry that is not competing on price. A hospital that does not compete on price will not automatically lower its prices when a money-saving technology becomes available. Rather, it will adopt the new technology and reap more profits. And yes, non-profit hospitals do try to earn a profit — I used to work for one.

  4. Bret Says:

    I agree with Larry. Cutler is wrong.

Leave a Reply