RSS Feed This entry was posted on Friday, August 14th, 2009 at 12:30 pm and is filed under FYI. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
 |
- At Other Sites
- Beam Me Up
- Book Review
- Breaking News
- CBO
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Ground Control to Sen. Democrats
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Drugs
- Health Care Access
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- Racial Disparities
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- Holiday
- In Memoriam
- In the News
- Interesting Videos
- Memorial Day
- New Videos
- NHS Update
- Notable and Quotable
- Obesity Update
- On Capitol Hill
- Personal Testimony
- Petition
- Plans
- Policy Update
- Question of the Week
- Quote of the Day
- Season's Greetings
- Song of the Season
- The People Speak Out
- Updates
Categories
Contributors
- Ron Bachman
- Michael Bond
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- John R. Graham
- Devon Herrick
- Regina Herzlinger
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
Recent Posts
- If You Own a Gun, Should You Pay More for Health Care?
- QuickCare
- I’m Not Sure I Believe This
- Does Your Insurer “Steer” You to a Preferred List of Doctors?
- Will We See Ads Like this in the U.S.?
- Top 10 Public Health Disasters, the First Lady Books Ritzy Vacation During Recession, and Docs Leave Field Midcareer
- Seniors Know More than Polltakers
- Lessons from Massachusetts
- Unintended Consequences for Kids
- It’s Baaack! Return of the “Public Option”
Blogroll
Aug 14, 2009
A number of studies claim to find that being uninsured leads to a higher mortality. Yet most of these studies fail to meet the minimal economists' standards for statistical inference. This is from a new Employment Policies Institute report by June and David O'Neill:
A significant fraction of the uninsured are in a financial position to purchase their own insurance, and we refer to them as the voluntarily uninsured. The remainder are the involuntarily uninsured, those with incomes that are low enough to make it unlikely that they could afford health insurance if they wanted to purchase it.
We define the voluntarily uninsured as those whose incomes are at or above 2.5 times the poverty threshold and find that about 43 percent of the uninsured in the 18-64 age group fall into that category.
We find that the higher probability of dying between 1992 and 2006 of the involuntarily uninsured compared to the privately insured is… 3 percentage points. The difference in mortality between the voluntarily uninsured and the privately insured is only… 2 percentage points.
7 Responses to “How Much Does Health Insurance Matter?”
RSS
Twitter
YouTube
LinkedIn
Facebook
Flickr
Helium
August 14th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
I do not believe an individual mandate is necessary. Neither am I convinced it is a problem when people prefer to pay for care out-of-pocket, rather than purchase health coverage.
It only becomes a problem when the uninsured rack up medical bills they cannot pay. A few dollars per month would buy a high-deductible policy — protecting families in the event of an unforeseen medical problem. Limited benefit plans are also inexpensive –- allowing people to see a doctor the few times per year most families actually need care.
What I want to know is: how come Democrats not only want to force people to have coverage, but want to force people to have a particular kind of coverage? Why have we heard nothing about mandating high-deductible plans (sort of like auto liability insurance) or mandating limited benefit plans like are now used in TennCare?
August 14th, 2009 at 10:19 pm
Wonderful results! And of course they are being completely ignored by the mainstream media.
August 15th, 2009 at 12:52 am
Agree with Ken. This is an incredible result. Thanks to the O’Neill’s for their excellent work and major contribution to health policy research.
August 15th, 2009 at 11:17 pm
This study needs wide distribution
August 16th, 2009 at 8:27 am
There has been so much nonsense written on this subject. This is a breath of fresh air.
August 16th, 2009 at 12:32 pm
The exact definition of “involuntarily uninsured” may be suitable for purposes of the study, but needs refinement before use as a general term.
Still, the study effectively debunks the myth that the 47 million uninsured are a monolithic bloc that must all be covered at once or they’re all going to die. In fact this group comprises several segments that require different solutions, which can be prioritized.
The segment that this study calls “involuntarily uninsured” really refers to the impoverished. These don’t need an overhaul of the health care system, they simply need financial support. We should provide what we can afford, no more and no less.
As for the rest, the first order of business should be to facilitate a stable system that doesn’t continually add to the pool of uninsured. Then we can find ways to begin bringing the dispossessed back into the fold. Adult passengers should strap on their own oxygen mask first before assisting those nearby, and plug the leaks before expending all their energy bailing (I’m thinking of a Catalina flying boat).
November 20th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
I tried a number of different Online Quote site, but the one i found most usefull was http://www.hasslefreeinsurance.net becuase there was lots of reviews and it also allowed me to submit my information to receive multiple insurance qoutes. I suggest that before you pay another dime or renew your insurance policy. Visit http://hasslefreeinsurance.net“>www.hasslefreeinsurancequote.com as { It could|will|most definiteley will save you a bunch|a lot|between 25%|30%|35% to 40%|45%|50% on your insurance policy|premium|premiums.