RSS Feed This entry was posted on Thursday, May 14th, 2009 at 2:43 pm and is filed under FYI. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
 |
- At Other Sites
- Beam Me Up
- Book Review
- Breaking News
- CBO
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Ground Control to Sen. Democrats
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Drugs
- Health Care Access
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- Racial Disparities
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- Holiday
- In Memoriam
- In the News
- Interesting Videos
- Memorial Day
- New Videos
- NHS Update
- Notable and Quotable
- Obesity Update
- On Capitol Hill
- Personal Testimony
- Petition
- Plans
- Policy Update
- Question of the Week
- Quote of the Day
- Season's Greetings
- Song of the Season
- The People Speak Out
- Updates
Categories
Contributors
- Ron Bachman
- Michael Bond
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- John R. Graham
- Devon Herrick
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
Recent Posts
- But Can It Tell You If Your Lover Has Been Faithful?
- Subsidizing the Rich
- Quality Competition
- Life Expectancy Explained
- What if Everybody Lived Ten Years Longer?
- Employers Playing Doctor
- Voices from the Past
- Cheating is Contagious, Best Time for Calorie Consumption, and How to Reduce Classroom Behavioral Problems
- Thinking the Unthinkable
- Benefit of Moderate Drinking, Germs in Gut Drive Appetite, and 22-Year-Old UK Hospital Patient Dies of Thirst
Blogroll
May 14, 2009
One in 750 children is born with a genetic disorder detectable by newborn screening…… The American College of Medical Genetics, the registered authority on newborn screening, recommends that states screen for 48 genetic diseases…… Texas only screens for 27 genetic diseases at birth.
3 Responses to “How Much Should Newborns Be Screened?”
RSS
Twitter
YouTube
LinkedIn
Facebook
Flickr
Helium
May 14th, 2009 at 4:31 pm
How about letting parents decide?
May 14th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Actually, this is a case where insurers face imperfect incentives. Odds are the family will stay on it’s current insurance plan for only a few years. So the insurer will tend to pay for a test only if the expected medical cost reduction exceeds the cost of the test (given overwhelmingly to healthy babies).
But the socially optimal decision is to pay for the test if it yields a positive rate of return over the child’s entire lifetime — not just the next few years.
Since insurers (for this reason) will tend to under-test, there is some pubic policy interest in requiring more tests than insurers would otherwise pay for.
May 15th, 2009 at 11:02 am
Bruce, if there were no insurance, the financial incentives for the family would be socially optimal. Since the family chooses what insurance to buy, it’s not clear that there is a case for intervention here.