RSS Feed This entry was posted on Monday, March 10th, 2008 at 10:28 am and is filed under 2008 Election, Beam Me Up. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
- Beam Me Up
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- In Memoriam
- Personal Testimony
- Plans
- Updates
Categories
Contributors
- Ron Bachman
- Michael Bond
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- Devon Herrick
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
Recent Posts
- Krugman Wrong Again on Health Care
- Three Cheers for Rhode Island Medicaid Reform
- McCain vs. the Critics, Part II
- Commonwealth Votes Early ― for Obama
- 677
- One Way to Reform Social Security
- Interstate Health Insurance Already Exists
- Walk-in Clinics
- Medical Tourism Reversing Course
- McCain vs. the Critics, Part I
Home Pages
 |
Mar 10, 2008
Barack Obama's health plan will fall well short of universal coverage according to an editorial by New York Times columnist Paul (you-veel-buy-zee-insurance) Krugman. Why? Obama's plan doesn't have enough coercion. Obama has a counter. Since the entire "universal coverage" discussion is about form over substance and rhetoric over reality, President Obama can sign an Executive Order just declaring that the current system (or any variation of it) is universal coverage. Voilà!
One Response to “Krugman Disses Obama”
March 11th, 2008 at 7:49 am
As always John, thank you for the excellent newsletter.