<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steffie’s Choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/steffie%e2%80%99s-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/steffie%e2%80%99s-choice/</link>
	<description>Insights on Health Care Reform &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:28:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/steffie%e2%80%99s-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-4564</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/steffie%e2%80%99s-choice/#comment-4564</guid>
		<description>Dr. Goodman,

I have not replied to any of your messages before, but I can&#039;t
help but ask a few questions in response to statements made in
this Health Alert...

Regarding out of pocket costs for US residents compared to the
Canadian health care system:  

Are Canadian citizens&#039; health impacted by the &#039;delay&#039; in health
maintenance appointments or follow up studies?  (ie is morbidity
or mortality increased by the several months wait for an
ultrasound or MRI?)  US expenditures on the health &#039;service&#039;
industry is astronomical compared to other countries without
comparative health care statistics to other 1st world nations.

I would argue that the number of MRI machines available in the
US hasn&#039;t significantly increased morbidity or mortality for our
country.  Effective use of resources are a measure of the cost
and benefit of health care resources.  

Certainly I don&#039;t have the magic bullet to fix our monolithic
health care system, but a balanced argument should include these
points.  

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Goodman,</p>
<p>I have not replied to any of your messages before, but I can&#8217;t<br />
help but ask a few questions in response to statements made in<br />
this Health Alert&#8230;</p>
<p>Regarding out of pocket costs for US residents compared to the<br />
Canadian health care system:  </p>
<p>Are Canadian citizens&#8217; health impacted by the &#8216;delay&#8217; in health<br />
maintenance appointments or follow up studies?  (ie is morbidity<br />
or mortality increased by the several months wait for an<br />
ultrasound or MRI?)  US expenditures on the health &#8217;service&#8217;<br />
industry is astronomical compared to other countries without<br />
comparative health care statistics to other 1st world nations.</p>
<p>I would argue that the number of MRI machines available in the<br />
US hasn&#8217;t significantly increased morbidity or mortality for our<br />
country.  Effective use of resources are a measure of the cost<br />
and benefit of health care resources.  </p>
<p>Certainly I don&#8217;t have the magic bullet to fix our monolithic<br />
health care system, but a balanced argument should include these<br />
points.  </p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Single-Payer Advocacy Taints HSA Study</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/steffie%e2%80%99s-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-4203</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Single-Payer Advocacy Taints HSA Study</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/steffie%e2%80%99s-choice/#comment-4203</guid>
		<description>[...] Moreover, as John Goodman points out on his blog, “the study is not available for public inspection.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moreover, as John Goodman points out on his blog, “the study is not available for public inspection.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Gluth</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/steffie%e2%80%99s-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Gluth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/steffie%e2%80%99s-choice/#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070416/FREE/70416012/1009/INIssueAlert01

John, I have attached a link to today&#039;s Investment News.  A few of the many supporters of consumer-driven healthcare have disputed her claims, but most importantly exposed her true agenda.  Thought you would find this interesting.  Thanks for letting me comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070416/FREE/70416012/1009/INIssueAlert01" rel="nofollow">http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070416/FREE/70416012/1009/INIssueAlert01</a></p>
<p>John, I have attached a link to today&#8217;s Investment News.  A few of the many supporters of consumer-driven healthcare have disputed her claims, but most importantly exposed her true agenda.  Thought you would find this interesting.  Thanks for letting me comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
