<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxing Health Insurance Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/</link>
	<description>Insights on Health Care Reform &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:34:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Goodman</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43357</link>
		<dc:creator>John Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43357</guid>
		<description>Response to Clark Havighurst:

The savings account should be a Roth-type HSA. Deposits should be made with after tax dollars and withdrawals for any purpose should be tax free. Growth should be tax free for the same reason that third party insurance is allowed to carry over reserves from period to period without taxation.

I&#039;m assuming that the tax credit will be completely exhausted by third party premiums. If any of the credit is left over, however, it could be contributed to the Roth account as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response to Clark Havighurst:</p>
<p>The savings account should be a Roth-type HSA. Deposits should be made with after tax dollars and withdrawals for any purpose should be tax free. Growth should be tax free for the same reason that third party insurance is allowed to carry over reserves from period to period without taxation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming that the tax credit will be completely exhausted by third party premiums. If any of the credit is left over, however, it could be contributed to the Roth account as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spec Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43326</link>
		<dc:creator>Spec Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43326</guid>
		<description>I suspect the big difference between Obama&#039;s proposal and previous proposals is that the Democrats want to get more revenue for the federal government. Past proposals were revenue-neutral.

A good way to describe the revenue-neutral approach that John describes is &quot;transferring the tax advantage from the business to the individual as part of giving the individual more control over health care decisions.&quot;

The Obama approach is &quot;eliminating the tax advantage to give more money and more control to the federal government.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the big difference between Obama&#8217;s proposal and previous proposals is that the Democrats want to get more revenue for the federal government. Past proposals were revenue-neutral.</p>
<p>A good way to describe the revenue-neutral approach that John describes is &#8220;transferring the tax advantage from the business to the individual as part of giving the individual more control over health care decisions.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Obama approach is &#8220;eliminating the tax advantage to give more money and more control to the federal government.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence A. Levine, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43319</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence A. Levine, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43319</guid>
		<description>John:

I totally agree with DoctorSH and FTIMMINS.  It is all about control of finances and the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:</p>
<p>I totally agree with DoctorSH and FTIMMINS.  It is all about control of finances and the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43293</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43293</guid>
		<description>Taxing the employee benefits of a few in order to pay for insurance for others ignores the fundamental inequity between individuals who pay for their own insurance with after-tax dollars (no matter their income level) and those who receive insurance tax-free as an employee benefit.  How does our government justify a tax penalty on Jill, who buys her own insurance, and tax favor Jack, who receives his insurance passively through his employer?  Equity requires taxing the value of all compensation received by Jack and Jill, whether as salary or benefits. Besides being fair it has the virtue of broadening the tax base, which would allow Obama to keep his pledge of reducing taxes (rates) while maintaining revenue.

John, this is not a new idea.  Why is it not embraced?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxing the employee benefits of a few in order to pay for insurance for others ignores the fundamental inequity between individuals who pay for their own insurance with after-tax dollars (no matter their income level) and those who receive insurance tax-free as an employee benefit.  How does our government justify a tax penalty on Jill, who buys her own insurance, and tax favor Jack, who receives his insurance passively through his employer?  Equity requires taxing the value of all compensation received by Jack and Jill, whether as salary or benefits. Besides being fair it has the virtue of broadening the tax base, which would allow Obama to keep his pledge of reducing taxes (rates) while maintaining revenue.</p>
<p>John, this is not a new idea.  Why is it not embraced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Goodman</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43277</link>
		<dc:creator>John Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43277</guid>
		<description>Reply to Marti:

The tax would be on the value of health insurance, not health expenses. So if the average family plan funded by an employer cost $12,000 each employee with family coverage would be taxed on a $12,000 benefit -- irrespective of how much the employee and the family actually spent on health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to Marti:</p>
<p>The tax would be on the value of health insurance, not health expenses. So if the average family plan funded by an employer cost $12,000 each employee with family coverage would be taxed on a $12,000 benefit &#8212; irrespective of how much the employee and the family actually spent on health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marti Settle</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43275</link>
		<dc:creator>Marti Settle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43275</guid>
		<description>John:

Taxing health insurance benefits?  What does that mean?  Last year I had breast cancer.  My insurance paid almost $300,000 in medical costs including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy MRI&#039;s, CAT scans bone scans x-rays medications and one 8 day hospital stay for an infection.  Does this mean that I would be liable for paying taxes on the $300,000 on the benefits paid by my insurance?  I would have had to forgo treatment and die because I would not be able to pay taxes on the benefits paid.  Tell me this is not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:</p>
<p>Taxing health insurance benefits?  What does that mean?  Last year I had breast cancer.  My insurance paid almost $300,000 in medical costs including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy MRI&#8217;s, CAT scans bone scans x-rays medications and one 8 day hospital stay for an infection.  Does this mean that I would be liable for paying taxes on the $300,000 on the benefits paid by my insurance?  I would have had to forgo treatment and die because I would not be able to pay taxes on the benefits paid.  Tell me this is not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43248</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43248</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&gt; What number do I call to find this HIPPA coverage for him?&lt;/i&gt;

Here is Kaiser&#039;s page.  They also offer a &quot;conversion plan&quot; that&#039;s almost identical.
https://kaiser.healthinsurance-asp.com/expressweb/user/hIPAANorthern.jsp

&lt;i&gt;&gt; Are you talking about the CA High Risk Pool?&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t think so.  The plans above are offered through Kaiser, and I know Anthem offers something similar (but even more expensive).  They are not accessible through a waiting list, so I suspect not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&gt; What number do I call to find this HIPPA coverage for him?</i></p>
<p>Here is Kaiser&#8217;s page.  They also offer a &#8220;conversion plan&#8221; that&#8217;s almost identical.<br />
<a href="https://kaiser.healthinsurance-asp.com/expressweb/user/hIPAANorthern.jsp" rel="nofollow">https://kaiser.healthinsurance-asp.com/expressweb/user/hIPAANorthern.jsp</a></p>
<p><i>&gt; Are you talking about the CA High Risk Pool?</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so.  The plans above are offered through Kaiser, and I know Anthem offers something similar (but even more expensive).  They are not accessible through a waiting list, so I suspect not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama disses doctors; gets standing O at AMA &#171; AAPS News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43243</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama disses doctors; gets standing O at AMA &#171; AAPS News of the Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43243</guid>
		<description>[...] hundreds of millions of dollars attacking John McCain for proposing to tax insurance benefits. Goodman explains the differences in proposed changes to the tax treatment of health [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hundreds of millions of dollars attacking John McCain for proposing to tax insurance benefits. Goodman explains the differences in proposed changes to the tax treatment of health [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Greiner</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43241</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Greiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43241</guid>
		<description>Taxing employer-based health insurance is the issue Bart.

Bart, I have a small company in California that wants to switch to individual insurance but the owner&#039;s son is uninsurable because of drug use.  He is going to be terminated in 2 months because of his age.

What number do I call to find this HIPPA coverage for him?  Are you talking about the CA High Risk Pool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxing employer-based health insurance is the issue Bart.</p>
<p>Bart, I have a small company in California that wants to switch to individual insurance but the owner&#8217;s son is uninsurable because of drug use.  He is going to be terminated in 2 months because of his age.</p>
<p>What number do I call to find this HIPPA coverage for him?  Are you talking about the CA High Risk Pool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/taxing-health-insurance-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-43240</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3866#comment-43240</guid>
		<description>...on the other hand, employer-based insurance doesn&#039;t have the problem of post-claim underwriting and policy rescission.  At least in California, HIPAA coverage is available after COBRA runs out.  What happens in other states is presumably up to the citizens of those states.

Not that I&#039;m happy with the status quo.  I just hate to see a discussion about federal health care reform muddied by conflating too many different issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;on the other hand, employer-based insurance doesn&#8217;t have the problem of post-claim underwriting and policy rescission.  At least in California, HIPAA coverage is available after COBRA runs out.  What happens in other states is presumably up to the citizens of those states.</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m happy with the status quo.  I just hate to see a discussion about federal health care reform muddied by conflating too many different issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
