RSS Feed This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008 at 7:14 am and is filed under FYI, Medical Economics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
- Beam Me Up
- Discussion
- From the Trenches
- FYI
- Health Alert
- 2008 Election
- African AIDS
- Babies
- Bad Studies
- Book Reviews
- Bush Health Plan
- Diabetics
- Health Care Costs
- Health Reform
- HSAs
- International
- LAZIK Surgery
- Malpractice
- Media Advisory
- Medicaid
- Medical Economics
- Medical Tourism
- Mental Health
- Minimum Wage
- Portability
- RAND Studies
- Safety
- Scary Forecasts
- SCHIP
- Seniors/Medicare
- Socialized Medicine
- Supply Side
- Telemedicine
- Transparency
- Uninsured
- Vet Care
- Vision Thing
- Workers Comp
- Hits & Misses
- Plans
- Updates
Categories
Contributors
- Ron Bachman
- Michael Bond
- Jim Frogue
- John Goodman
- Linda Gorman
- Robert Graboyes
- Devon Herrick
- Regina Herzlinger
- June O'Neill
- Roy Ramthun
- Greg Scandlen
Recent Posts
- Love and Marriage
- 372
- Health Savings Accounts Come to India
- Who Needs Medicaid?
- Uninsurance Problem Solved by Executive Order
- Taxing the Poor, Some More
- Obesity Strikes Back
- Hyping Health Risks
- Preventive Care Rarely Pays
- One More Reason for the Universal Health Savings Account
Home Pages
Apr 2, 2008
Kudos to Victor Fuchs for a JAMA article (which unfortunately is gated) and to Fuchs and Ezekiel Emanuel in a Chicago Tribune editorial that says much the same thing. Economic statistics show what common sense should have told us anyway: health insurance and other employee benefits come at the expense of money wages. Far from be being a gift from employers, health insurance is "paid for" by employees and health cost increases are the primary reason for stagnating wage growth.
One Response to “There’s No Free Lunch”
April 2nd, 2008 at 11:59 am
Small employers will tell you that people understand this just fine. If the employer doesn't offer health insurance, new hires will use that fact to bargain for higher wages.
A major problem is that some fraction of people have no idea a) that they can purchase their own policies or b) haven't tried to do so because irresponsible media coverage has convinced them that it is too expensive and/or unavailable. When they are nagged into buying a policy, they are surprised by the fact that individual policies are available at reasonable cost, especially if they are in their 20s. Most people also have no idea that guaranteed issue coverage is available regardless of their health history, though the price is higher.
Why are these simple observations some of the best kept secrets of the great health care policy debate? Cynics might point out that they don't fit with the "the system is broken and we need drastic increases in government control to fix it" meme, and that the market for individual insurance has been destroyed by regulation in many of the markets in which reporters congregate.