This entry was posted
on Thursday, January 15th, 2009 at 9:07 am and is filed under Hits & Misses.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Interesting legal issue raised by the kidney. The husband should have made the gift conditional on continuing good relations. Or at a minimum, he should have gotten agreement on how he was to be compensated in case of a divorce.
I suppose it’s one more thing to put in a pre-nupt.
If you cannot buy a kidney, then you can’t have a contractual exchange for one. A contract requires consideration. So maybe the husband can claim he never relinguished his ownership rights.
[...] previously reported on 6 studies that found that vitamins do not prevent cancer, 5 things you should know about vitamins and — to be fair and balanced — the case for taking [...]
January 15th, 2009 at 9:47 am
The vitamin studies are shocking. Think how much money people have spent on antioxidents and other vitamins, thinking they are preventing cancer.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:29 am
Interesting legal issue raised by the kidney. The husband should have made the gift conditional on continuing good relations. Or at a minimum, he should have gotten agreement on how he was to be compensated in case of a divorce.
I suppose it’s one more thing to put in a pre-nupt.
January 15th, 2009 at 7:16 pm
If you cannot buy a kidney, then you can’t have a contractual exchange for one. A contract requires consideration. So maybe the husband can claim he never relinguished his ownership rights.
January 28th, 2010 at 11:31 am
[...] previously reported on 6 studies that found that vitamins do not prevent cancer, 5 things you should know about vitamins and — to be fair and balanced — the case for taking [...]