This entry was posted on Monday, September 18th, 2006 at 4:14 pm and is filed under Health Alert, Workers Comp. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
.funkyblue { color:#0000AF; }
Workers' Compensation is a hugely wasteful system that has received almost no attention from think tanks. All too often, employers believe they have lowered health care costs through one reform or another, only to discover that employees simply shifted their claims from group health to worker's comp. See the summary below of a new study on this topic from the NCPA.
Workers' compensation costs are increasing because state systems provide incentives for employers, employees and others to behave in ways that cause costs to be higher and workplaces to be less safe than they otherwise would be, says N. Michael Helvacian, a Senior Fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis. Specifically:
Addressing these problems would increase the efficiency of the system by controlling costs and giving workers a greater choice of benefits, says Helvacian. If state systems were properly reformed, employers could:
Source: N. Michael Helvacian, "Workers' Compensation: Rx for Policy Reform," National Center for Policy Analysis, Policy Report No. 287, September 2006.
September 19th, 2006 at 10:07 am
That's one area where individual health insurance has an advantage over group, in that it DOES cover work related accidents. Ralph
September 19th, 2006 at 10:09 am
You should add to this the state regulations that allow small employers and the self-employed (e.g. illegal immigrants) not to get insurance coverage.
There is the notorious case of the Colorado roofer, reported on 60 Minutes as a story about health insurance, but actually a problem with Colorado workers comp that allowed the roofer (a sub-contractor) to have no insurance, not to be covered by the prime contractor, not to have health insurance, and then to appear on 60 minutes (following a work-related injury) as an example of a problem with the health insurance industry!
As a small employer, I am glad my premiums are not 100% experience rated. I would need to buy additional catastrophic coverage if they were. This is not at all an unusual insurance practice. We are aware of our premiums and take steps to ensure as far as possible a safe workplace (although we are white collar so not too risky). Since many work comp payments are scheduled, integration with discounted fee-for-service networks could be more difficult than you suggest.
Regards,
Ian Duncan, FSA FIA FCIA MAAA
Solucia Inc
September 19th, 2006 at 1:27 pm
Dr. Goodman:
Workman’s Comp has had gotten a lot heat in the past few years and what it needs is some light. Keep up the good work.
The fees are adequate for the medical services provided. HOWEVER, not for the headache and hassle associated with malingering litigious patients. Not to mention medical forms that are nothing like the standard HCFA 1500 used by all other third parties.
Sincerely,
Charles Akins MD
September 19th, 2006 at 1:28 pm
John;
I have been a peer review doctor for WC. It is a spectacular scam, both by patients and the designated doctors (mainly chiropractors). We need to focus on how to remedy this deplorable system.
Dr Bob