Sign up to receive
Health Alerts via Email
Enter email address below:

To receive via RSS Feed
Click here:
RSS Feed
Free Our Health Care Now!

Contributors

  • Ron Bachman
  • Michael Bond
  • Jim Frogue
  • John Goodman
  • Linda Gorman
  • Robert Graboyes
  • John R. Graham
  • Devon Herrick
  • Regina Herzlinger
  • June O'Neill
  • Roy Ramthun
  • Greg Scandlen

Recent Posts


Blogroll


This appeared in a Wall Street Journal editorial:

Beginning in 2015, Medicare would rank doctors against their peers based on how much they cost the program – and then automatically cut all payments by 5% to anyone who falls into the 90th percentile or above.

Since there will always be a missing chair when the music stops, every year one of 10 physicians will be punished if he orders too many tests, performs too many procedures or prescribes too many drugs – whether or not the treatments result in better patient outcomes. The 5% fine is substantial given that Medicare’s price controls already pay only 83 cents on the private dollar.

Hardest hit: cardiology and oncology.

Bookmark and Share
5 Responses to “Would Rationing by Any Other Name Be as Painful?”
  1. Larry C. Says:

    Sounds very, very bad.

  2. Brian W. Says:

    Sounds like a plan to penalize doctors who treat lots of sick patients.

    Doctors who treat relatively healthy patients will make out okay.

  3. Bruce Says:

    I agree with Brian.

  4. Vicki B. Says:

    As we can see Cardiology and Oncology will be hardest hit. Heart disease and cancer are our two main causes of premature deaths. How many lifes will be loss because of these cuts? Testing and treatment should be based on appropiate criteria and not penalized because of what some may consider excess use.

  5. Ken Says:

    This is very worrisome.

Leave a Reply